Proceeds of crime and money laundering: PMLA prosecution requires subsisting predicate offence; discharge of predicate accused precludes further prose...
Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
In a CIRP concerning a mixed-use real estate project, the dominant issue was whether extraordinary powers could be invoked to ensure an equitable resolution among competing stakeholders, particularly protecting homebuyers, where the ordinary CIRP architecture was viewed as inadequate to secure balanced outcomes. The Court accepted the amicus recommendations and stakeholder responses indicating broad confidence in a court-monitored mechanism, and held that the case warranted exercise of Article 142 to "do complete justice" while maintaining fidelity to IBC objectives. Consequently, it directed a court-appointed committee with judicial oversight to ensure continuity of the resolution process and safeguard homebuyers' rights. - SC
In a CIRP concerning a mixed-use real estate project, the dominant issue was whether extraordinary powers could be invoked to ensure an equitable resolution among competing stakeholders, particularly protecting homebuyers, where the ordinary CIRP architecture was viewed as inadequate to secure balanced outcomes. The Court accepted the amicus recommendations and stakeholder responses indicating broad confidence in a court-monitored mechanism, and held that the case warranted exercise of Article 142 to "do complete justice" while maintaining fidelity to IBC objectives. Consequently, it directed a court-appointed committee with judicial oversight to ensure continuity of the resolution process and safeguard homebuyers' rights. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
