https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95524 In a CIRP concerning a mixed-use real estate project, the dominant issue was whether extraordinary powers could be invoked to ensure an equitable resolution among competing stakeholders, particularly protecting homebuyers, where the ordinary CIRP architecture was viewed as inadequate to secure balanced outcomes. The Court accepted the amicus recommendations and stakeholder responses indicating broad confidence in a court-monitored mechanism, and held that the case warranted exercise of Article 142 to "do complete justice" while maintaining fidelity to IBC objectives. Consequently, it directed a court-appointed committee with judicial oversight to ensure continuity of the resolution process and safeguard homebuyers' rights. - SC en-us Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:27:34 +0530 Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:27:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95524 In a CIRP concerning a mixed-use real estate project, the dominant issue was whether extraordinary powers could be invoked to ensure an equitable resolution among competing stakeholders, particularly protecting homebuyers, where the ordinary CIRP architecture was viewed as inadequate to secure balanced outcomes. The Court accepted the amicus recommendations and stakeholder responses indicating broad confidence in a court-monitored mechanism, and held that the case warranted exercise of Article 142 to "do complete justice" while maintaining fidelity to IBC objectives. Consequently, it directed a court-appointed committee with judicial oversight to ensure continuity of the resolution process and safeguard homebuyers' rights. - SC Highlights IBC Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:27:34 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95524