Search and seizure: abatement of earlier search bars use of prior seized material in later search-based assessments; relief limited to new documents f...
Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
In a CIRP concerning a mixed-use real estate project, the dominant issue was whether extraordinary powers could be invoked to ensure an equitable resolution among competing stakeholders, particularly protecting homebuyers, where the ordinary CIRP architecture was viewed as inadequate to secure balanced outcomes. The Court accepted the amicus recommendations and stakeholder responses indicating broad confidence in a court-monitored mechanism, and held that the case warranted exercise of Article 142 to "do complete justice" while maintaining fidelity to IBC objectives. Consequently, it directed a court-appointed committee with judicial oversight to ensure continuity of the resolution process and safeguard homebuyers' rights. - SC
In a CIRP concerning a mixed-use real estate project, the dominant issue was whether extraordinary powers could be invoked to ensure an equitable resolution among competing stakeholders, particularly protecting homebuyers, where the ordinary CIRP architecture was viewed as inadequate to secure balanced outcomes. The Court accepted the amicus recommendations and stakeholder responses indicating broad confidence in a court-monitored mechanism, and held that the case warranted exercise of Article 142 to "do complete justice" while maintaining fidelity to IBC objectives. Consequently, it directed a court-appointed committee with judicial oversight to ensure continuity of the resolution process and safeguard homebuyers' rights. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
