Corporate guarantee invocation in insolvency petition: enforceability upheld, conditional sanction letter not a novation, limitation not barred after ...
NPCI-based bank account validation for IEC applications and modifications enables real-time validation; incorrect details block submission or trigger ...
Creation/Invocation of pledge of securities through depository system: standardized pledge forms, notice requirement and invocation notifications to p...
Calendar Spread margin benefit for Single Stock Derivatives suspended on expiry day for expiring contracts; exchanges must implement systems and rule ...
Once an application under section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was allowed and the assessee was treated as not in default, the consequential demand for the earlier assessment year stood stayed, and the revenue lacked authority to adjust refunds of a later assessment year against that stayed demand. As the assessee had already deposited more than 20% of the disputed tax to secure stay, the adjustment made from the refundable amount of the subsequent assessment year was held impermissible. The revenue was directed to refund the amount adjusted pursuant to the intimation, excluding the amount deposited for stay, within the stipulated time. - HC
Once an application under section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was allowed and the assessee was treated as not in default, the consequential demand for the earlier assessment year stood stayed, and the revenue lacked authority to adjust refunds of a later assessment year against that stayed demand. As the assessee had already deposited more than 20% of the disputed tax to secure stay, the adjustment made from the refundable amount of the subsequent assessment year was held impermissible. The revenue was directed to refund the amount adjusted pursuant to the intimation, excluding the amount deposited for stay, within the stipulated time. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
