Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Cross country pipeline classification and ITC entitlement: pipelines outside factory treated as immovable, ITC disallowed under Section 17 restriction...
Once an application under section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was allowed and the assessee was treated as not in default, the consequential demand for the earlier assessment year stood stayed, and the revenue lacked authority to adjust refunds of a later assessment year against that stayed demand. As the assessee had already deposited more than 20% of the disputed tax to secure stay, the adjustment made from the refundable amount of the subsequent assessment year was held impermissible. The revenue was directed to refund the amount adjusted pursuant to the intimation, excluding the amount deposited for stay, within the stipulated time. - HC
Once an application under section 220(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was allowed and the assessee was treated as not in default, the consequential demand for the earlier assessment year stood stayed, and the revenue lacked authority to adjust refunds of a later assessment year against that stayed demand. As the assessee had already deposited more than 20% of the disputed tax to secure stay, the adjustment made from the refundable amount of the subsequent assessment year was held impermissible. The revenue was directed to refund the amount adjusted pursuant to the intimation, excluding the amount deposited for stay, within the stipulated time. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
