Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For assessment under s.153C, the dominant issue was whether the "date of search" for computing the ten relevant assessment years is the original search date in the searched person's case or the date on which seized material was received by the AO of the non-searched person under the first proviso to s.153C(1). Applying Explanation (1) to s.153A, the Tribunal held that the receipt date is deemed to be the search date for the non-searched person, and the ten assessment years must be counted backward from the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such deemed search occurred. Since receipt occurred in AY 2022-23, AY 2012-13 fell outside the permissible block; the Revenue's appeal failed. - ITAT
For assessment under s.153C, the dominant issue was whether the "date of search" for computing the ten relevant assessment years is the original search date in the searched person's case or the date on which seized material was received by the AO of the non-searched person under the first proviso to s.153C(1). Applying Explanation (1) to s.153A, the Tribunal held that the receipt date is deemed to be the search date for the non-searched person, and the ten assessment years must be counted backward from the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such deemed search occurred. Since receipt occurred in AY 2022-23, AY 2012-13 fell outside the permissible block; the Revenue's appeal failed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.