PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For assessment under s.153C, the dominant issue was whether the "date of search" for computing the ten relevant assessment years is the original search date in the searched person's case or the date on which seized material was received by the AO of the non-searched person under the first proviso to s.153C(1). Applying Explanation (1) to s.153A, the Tribunal held that the receipt date is deemed to be the search date for the non-searched person, and the ten assessment years must be counted backward from the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such deemed search occurred. Since receipt occurred in AY 2022-23, AY 2012-13 fell outside the permissible block; the Revenue's appeal failed. - ITAT
For assessment under s.153C, the dominant issue was whether the "date of search" for computing the ten relevant assessment years is the original search date in the searched person's case or the date on which seized material was received by the AO of the non-searched person under the first proviso to s.153C(1). Applying Explanation (1) to s.153A, the Tribunal held that the receipt date is deemed to be the search date for the non-searched person, and the ten assessment years must be counted backward from the end of the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such deemed search occurred. Since receipt occurred in AY 2022-23, AY 2012-13 fell outside the permissible block; the Revenue's appeal failed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.