Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Imports of inshell walnuts under DFIA were held eligible for exemption from basic customs duty under Notification No. 25/2023-Cus because the DFIA permitted import of "other confectionary ingredients" including nut and nut products and "dietary fibre" based on input description and group classification; therefore, non-availability of a specific ITC(HS) tariff line in the licence did not bar clearance when the goods otherwise matched the permitted description. Challenge to the advance ruling was rejected since s.28J aims at certainty and facilitation, and appellate scrutiny under s.28KA is narrowly confined to profoundly illegal, arbitrary, or unreasoned rulings; no such infirmity was shown, so the appeal was dismissed. - HC
Imports of inshell walnuts under DFIA were held eligible for exemption from basic customs duty under Notification No. 25/2023-Cus because the DFIA permitted import of "other confectionary ingredients" including nut and nut products and "dietary fibre" based on input description and group classification; therefore, non-availability of a specific ITC(HS) tariff line in the licence did not bar clearance when the goods otherwise matched the permitted description. Challenge to the advance ruling was rejected since s.28J aims at certainty and facilitation, and appellate scrutiny under s.28KA is narrowly confined to profoundly illegal, arbitrary, or unreasoned rulings; no such infirmity was shown, so the appeal was dismissed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
