DFIA exemption for in-shell walnuts upheld where generic input description was met and no separate ITC(HS) match was needed.

Under the DFIA scheme, in-shell walnuts were treated as falling within the relevant generic input descriptions of "nut and nut products" and "dietary fibre", so the basic customs duty exemption under Notification No. 25/2023-Cus was upheld. The commentary also states that, for inputs not covered by a specific FTP restriction, the scheme does not require a separate ITC(HS) match or technical correlation beyond the authorization's input description and quantity. A later clarificatory circular was noted as supporting that position, and the appeal was unsuccessful because existing precedent and the circular left no basis to interfere with the advance ruling.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether in-shell walnuts are covered by the DFIA descriptions of "nut and nut products" and "dietary fibre" so as to qualify for exemption from basic customs duty under Notification No. 25/2023-Cus dated 01.04.2023; (ii) Whether the importer was required to establish a separate ITC(HS) match or technical correlation between the imported walnuts and the exported product for claiming DFIA benefit.

Issue (i): Whether in-shell walnuts are covered by the DFIA descriptions of "nut and nut products" and "dietary fibre" so as to qualify for exemption from basic customs duty under Notification No. 25/2023-Cus dated 01.04.2023.

Analysis: The transferability of the DFIA scheme, the relevant SION entries for confectionary products and biscuits, and the earlier judicial view on walnuts as an input falling within the dietary fibre description were relied upon. The decision also noted that the authority had accepted the import under the generic input descriptions contained in the DFIA and that no breach of the value-based limitation was shown.

Conclusion: The import of in-shell walnuts was held to be permissible under the DFIA entries and the exemption was not disturbed.

Issue (ii): Whether the importer was required to establish a separate ITC(HS) match or technical correlation between the imported walnuts and the exported product for claiming DFIA benefit.

Analysis: The decision accepted the view that, for inputs outside the specifically restricted category under the FTP, the DFIA scheme does not insist on a separate technical correlation or ITC(HS) matching beyond the input description and quantity. The later clarificatory circular was also taken into account as reinforcing that position.

Conclusion: No separate ITC(HS) matching or technical correlation was held necessary for the claim.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed, as the questions sought to be raised were treated as already answered by existing precedent and the clarificatory circular, leaving no basis for interference with the advance ruling.

Ratio Decidendi: Under the DFIA scheme, where the imported goods fit the relevant input description and quantity in the authorization and are not hit by a specific FTP restriction, exemption cannot be denied merely for want of a separate ITC(HS) match or technical correlation.

---