Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The dominant issue was whether a civil suit challenging an allegedly oppressive EOGM and consequential corporate actions was maintainable in view of the Companies Act, 2013. Since Section 242 vests the NCLT with power to grant appropriate reliefs to end oppression/mismanagement, and Section 430 bars civil court jurisdiction over matters the NCLT is empowered to determine, the court held that the plaint's real cause of action and reliefs fell within the NCLT's domain; consequently, the civil suit was not maintainable and the appeal was disposed of by affirming the dismissal for want of civil court jurisdiction - HC
The dominant issue was whether a civil suit challenging an allegedly oppressive EOGM and consequential corporate actions was maintainable in view of the Companies Act, 2013. Since Section 242 vests the NCLT with power to grant appropriate reliefs to end oppression/mismanagement, and Section 430 bars civil court jurisdiction over matters the NCLT is empowered to determine, the court held that the plaint's real cause of action and reliefs fell within the NCLT's domain; consequently, the civil suit was not maintainable and the appeal was disposed of by affirming the dismissal for want of civil court jurisdiction - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.