https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95399 The dominant issue was whether a civil suit challenging an allegedly oppressive EOGM and consequential corporate actions was maintainable in view of the Companies Act, 2013. Since Section 242 vests the NCLT with power to grant appropriate reliefs to end oppression/mismanagement, and Section 430 bars civil court jurisdiction over matters the NCLT is empowered to determine, the court held that the plaint's real cause of action and reliefs fell within the NCLT's domain; consequently, the civil suit was not maintainable and the appeal was disposed of by affirming the dismissal for want of civil court jurisdiction - HC en-us Fri, 26 Dec 2025 07:18:36 +0530 Fri, 26 Dec 2025 07:18:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95399 The dominant issue was whether a civil suit challenging an allegedly oppressive EOGM and consequential corporate actions was maintainable in view of the Companies Act, 2013. Since Section 242 vests the NCLT with power to grant appropriate reliefs to end oppression/mismanagement, and Section 430 bars civil court jurisdiction over matters the NCLT is empowered to determine, the court held that the plaint's real cause of action and reliefs fell within the NCLT's domain; consequently, the civil suit was not maintainable and the appeal was disposed of by affirming the dismissal for want of civil court jurisdiction - HC Highlights Companies Law Fri, 26 Dec 2025 07:18:36 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95399