Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Challenge to adjudication alleging fraudulent availment of...
Alleged goods-less invoicing and ineligible CENVAT credit claim challenged for missing documents; writ dismissed for non-participation, appeal available
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Challenge to adjudication alleging fraudulent availment of ineligible CENVAT credit on the ground that relied-upon documents were not supplied was rejected because the noticee was fully aware of the show-cause notice yet neither filed any substantive reply nor effectively participated in adjudication, leaving the allegations unrebutted. Given the nature of alleged goods-less invoicing and complex, evidence-intensive transaction chains, the dispute required factual examination unsuitable for writ jurisdiction, and the noticee's interests were adequately protected by the statutory appellate remedy. The writ petition was dismissed. - HC
Challenge to adjudication alleging fraudulent availment of ineligible CENVAT credit on the ground that relied-upon documents were not supplied was rejected because the noticee was fully aware of the show-cause notice yet neither filed any substantive reply nor effectively participated in adjudication, leaving the allegations unrebutted. Given the nature of alleged goods-less invoicing and complex, evidence-intensive transaction chains, the dispute required factual examination unsuitable for writ jurisdiction, and the noticee's interests were adequately protected by the statutory appellate remedy. The writ petition was dismissed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
