<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Alleged goods-less invoicing and ineligible CENVAT credit claim challenged for missing documents; writ dismissed for non-participation, appeal available</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95287</link>
    <description>Challenge to adjudication alleging fraudulent availment of ineligible CENVAT credit on the ground that relied-upon documents were not supplied was rejected because the noticee was fully aware of the show-cause notice yet neither filed any substantive reply nor effectively participated in adjudication, leaving the allegations unrebutted. Given the nature of alleged goods-less invoicing and complex, evidence-intensive transaction chains, the dispute required factual examination unsuitable for writ jurisdiction, and the noticee&#039;s interests were adequately protected by the statutory appellate remedy. The writ petition was dismissed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Alleged goods-less invoicing and ineligible CENVAT credit claim challenged for missing documents; writ dismissed for non-participation, appeal available</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95287</link>
      <description>Challenge to adjudication alleging fraudulent availment of ineligible CENVAT credit on the ground that relied-upon documents were not supplied was rejected because the noticee was fully aware of the show-cause notice yet neither filed any substantive reply nor effectively participated in adjudication, leaving the allegations unrebutted. Given the nature of alleged goods-less invoicing and complex, evidence-intensive transaction chains, the dispute required factual examination unsuitable for writ jurisdiction, and the noticee&#039;s interests were adequately protected by the statutory appellate remedy. The writ petition was dismissed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>