Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Whether addition under s.69 for alleged cash "on-money" paid for purchase of a shop could be sustained merely on statements recorded during search and an Excel sheet found in a third party's pen drive. The material on record, including allotment letter and bank statements, showed no evidence of any cash payment in AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 and indicated that the purchase transaction occurred only in AY 2019-20; hence the s.69 additions for AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 were deleted. For AY 2019-20, the statements and Excel sheet were held uncorroborated by independent evidence, consistent with co-ordinate bench precedents; hence the s.69 addition was deleted and the appeals were allowed - ITAT
Whether addition under s.69 for alleged cash "on-money" paid for purchase of a shop could be sustained merely on statements recorded during search and an Excel sheet found in a third party's pen drive. The material on record, including allotment letter and bank statements, showed no evidence of any cash payment in AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 and indicated that the purchase transaction occurred only in AY 2019-20; hence the s.69 additions for AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 were deleted. For AY 2019-20, the statements and Excel sheet were held uncorroborated by independent evidence, consistent with co-ordinate bench precedents; hence the s.69 addition was deleted and the appeals were allowed - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.