<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Shop purchase &quot;on-money&quot; cash allegation based on search statements and third-party Excel; s.69 additions deleted for lack of evidence</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95274</link>
    <description>Whether addition under s.69 for alleged cash &quot;on-money&quot; paid for purchase of a shop could be sustained merely on statements recorded during search and an Excel sheet found in a third party&#039;s pen drive. The material on record, including allotment letter and bank statements, showed no evidence of any cash payment in AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 and indicated that the purchase transaction occurred only in AY 2019-20; hence the s.69 additions for AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 were deleted. For AY 2019-20, the statements and Excel sheet were held uncorroborated by independent evidence, consistent with co-ordinate bench precedents; hence the s.69 addition was deleted and the appeals were allowed - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=873217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Shop purchase &quot;on-money&quot; cash allegation based on search statements and third-party Excel; s.69 additions deleted for lack of evidence</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95274</link>
      <description>Whether addition under s.69 for alleged cash &quot;on-money&quot; paid for purchase of a shop could be sustained merely on statements recorded during search and an Excel sheet found in a third party&#039;s pen drive. The material on record, including allotment letter and bank statements, showed no evidence of any cash payment in AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 and indicated that the purchase transaction occurred only in AY 2019-20; hence the s.69 additions for AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 were deleted. For AY 2019-20, the statements and Excel sheet were held uncorroborated by independent evidence, consistent with co-ordinate bench precedents; hence the s.69 addition was deleted and the appeals were allowed - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 07:49:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>