Attachment and proclamation of sale of immovable property: limitation treated from financial year end; proclamation held within period, petition dismi...
Second Schedule attachment and validity of a post-notice mortgage: TRO cannot declare mortgage void ab initio; sale and appropriation allowed thereaft...
Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Whether addition under s.69 for alleged cash "on-money" paid for purchase of a shop could be sustained merely on statements recorded during search and an Excel sheet found in a third party's pen drive. The material on record, including allotment letter and bank statements, showed no evidence of any cash payment in AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 and indicated that the purchase transaction occurred only in AY 2019-20; hence the s.69 additions for AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 were deleted. For AY 2019-20, the statements and Excel sheet were held uncorroborated by independent evidence, consistent with co-ordinate bench precedents; hence the s.69 addition was deleted and the appeals were allowed - ITAT
Whether addition under s.69 for alleged cash "on-money" paid for purchase of a shop could be sustained merely on statements recorded during search and an Excel sheet found in a third party's pen drive. The material on record, including allotment letter and bank statements, showed no evidence of any cash payment in AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 and indicated that the purchase transaction occurred only in AY 2019-20; hence the s.69 additions for AYs 2017-18 and 2018-19 were deleted. For AY 2019-20, the statements and Excel sheet were held uncorroborated by independent evidence, consistent with co-ordinate bench precedents; hence the s.69 addition was deleted and the appeals were allowed - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.