Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Misclassification between copra and dry coconut: customs recovery and re-valuation quashed for lack of prior licensing-authority invalidation, appeals...
Credit of TDS under s. 199 was denied on the ground that the corresponding income was offered to tax by a related entity rather than by the assessee in the year of claim. It was held that where TDS has been deducted and deposited, and the credit appears in the assessee's Form 26AS, the assessee is entitled to such credit, consistent with settled precedent; however, safeguards are required to prevent double credit. The Assessing Officer was directed to grant the TDS credit after verifying that the related entity has not claimed the same TDS credit in its own assessment. Appeal allowed. - ITAT
Credit of TDS under s. 199 was denied on the ground that the corresponding income was offered to tax by a related entity rather than by the assessee in the year of claim. It was held that where TDS has been deducted and deposited, and the credit appears in the assessee's Form 26AS, the assessee is entitled to such credit, consistent with settled precedent; however, safeguards are required to prevent double credit. The Assessing Officer was directed to grant the TDS credit after verifying that the related entity has not claimed the same TDS credit in its own assessment. Appeal allowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
