Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>TDS credit in Form 26AS: can the named taxpayer claim s.199 credit when related concern reported income? Allowed</h1> The dominant issue was whether TDS credit under s.199 can be granted to a person in whose name the TDS appears in Form 26AS, even though the corresponding ... Wrong disallowance of the TDS credit - as per assessee TDS has been duly deducted and deposited with the Government and the same is reflected in Form 26AS - whether u/s 199 for claiming credit of any TDS deducted and deposited to the government, such credit should match/relate to the assessee's corresponding income which is assessable in the year when the TDS credit is claimed? HELD THAT:- In the instant case, the credit for TDS is being claimed by the assessee and the corresponding income is being offered by its sister concern. Whether in such a situation credit for TDS can be extended to the person claiming the TDS. We find that the above question has been answered in assessee’s favour by catena of decisions relied upon by the assessee, including the decision of Relcom [2015 (11) TMI 284 - DELHI HIGH COURT] to justify its claim. Assessee is entitled to the credit of the TDS mentioned in Form 26AS issued to it. We accordingly direct the Assessing Officer to allow credit of TDS after verification that the said sister concern has not claimed the corresponding TDS in its own hand. Assessee appeal allowed. 1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED 1. Whether credit of TDS reflected in the assessee's Form 26AS can be allowed where the corresponding income on which such TDS was deducted is stated to have been declared and offered to tax in the hands of a sister concern, and not in the assessee's return for the relevant assessment year. 2. Whether, on the facts, the Assessing Officer is required to grant TDS credit to the assessee, subject to verification that the sister concern has not claimed the same TDS credit in its own hands. 2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Issue 1: Allowability of TDS credit to the assessee when corresponding income is offered by a sister concern Legal framework: The Court examined the requirement under section 199 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 concerning credit for tax deducted at source, in the context of the assessee's claim of TDS credit as appearing in Form 26AS and the objection that corresponding income was not offered in the assessee's hands in the relevant year. Interpretation and reasoning: The Court found that TDS of Rs. 3,41,286/- was reflected in the assessee's Form 26AS and that the assessee produced a confirmation stating that the corresponding income (on which TDS was deducted) had been declared in the hands of its sister concern. The Court treated the decisive question as whether TDS credit must necessarily be denied merely because the corresponding income is offered to tax by a sister concern, despite the TDS being reflected against the assessee. The Court relied upon and applied the principle emerging from the Delhi High Court's decision discussed in the order, which supports granting TDS credit in such circumstances to avoid a situation where tax deducted at source is retained without credit being effectively available, and where denial would rest on a 'mere technical ground,' particularly when the related entity has not availed the credit. Conclusion: The Court held that the assessee is entitled to credit of the TDS mentioned in Form 26AS issued to it, even though the corresponding income was stated to have been offered by the sister concern, subject to the condition that double credit is not allowed. Issue 2: Verification condition to prevent double claim of the same TDS credit Interpretation and reasoning: While allowing the assessee's claim in principle, the Court considered it necessary to safeguard against duplication of credit. Since the assessee's case proceeded on the footing that the sister concern had offered the corresponding income, the Court directed that TDS credit should be granted to the assessee only after verifying that the sister concern has not claimed the corresponding TDS credit in its own hands. Conclusion: The Court directed the Assessing Officer to allow the TDS credit to the assessee after verification that the sister concern has not claimed the same TDS credit, and accordingly allowed the assessee's grounds and appeal.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found