Tax determination against deceased proprietor invalid where no notice to legal representative; appeal rejected without addressing jurisdictional defec...
Revocation of GST registration and permission to file blocked returns; conditional defreezing of bank accounts after security and instalment applicati...
Right to access seized electronic evidence: impugned adjudication treated as additional show cause notice, remand for fresh hearing and return of mate...
Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Aftermarket trading expenses for purposes of computing deduction under s. 80IC were held allocable on the basis of aftermarket trading sales ratio, as the expenses were incurred to earn such sales; the contrary allocation on total sales was rejected and the Revenue's challenge failed while the assessee succeeded. Adjustment of eligible profits under s. 80IC by recomputing arm's length price for stock transfers to head office was disallowed because s. 80IA(12) was inapplicable where the eligible unit continued with the same assessee post-amalgamation; relief was granted to the assessee. Reimbursement payments to non-residents were held not constituting income, so no withholding under s. 195 arose and disallowance under s. 40(a)(i) was deleted. Royalty was treated as revenue expenditure, and a notional 10% markup to head office was disallowed. - ITAT
Aftermarket trading expenses for purposes of computing deduction under s. 80IC were held allocable on the basis of aftermarket trading sales ratio, as the expenses were incurred to earn such sales; the contrary allocation on total sales was rejected and the Revenue's challenge failed while the assessee succeeded. Adjustment of eligible profits under s. 80IC by recomputing arm's length price for stock transfers to head office was disallowed because s. 80IA(12) was inapplicable where the eligible unit continued with the same assessee post-amalgamation; relief was granted to the assessee. Reimbursement payments to non-residents were held not constituting income, so no withholding under s. 195 arose and disallowance under s. 40(a)(i) was deleted. Royalty was treated as revenue expenditure, and a notional 10% markup to head office was disallowed. - ITAT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
