Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Cancellation of GST registration was held vitiated for breach of natural justice where the taxpayer's revocation application remained undecided beyond the statutory time and the department failed to disclose its status, undermining the cancellation process; consequently, the show-cause notice, cancellation order, and appellate dismissal were set aside. Further, the department's stance was internally inconsistent: cancellation proceeded on the premise of no business activity at the premises, yet best-judgment assessments under section 63 for multiple prior years alleged continued business based on GSTR-2A; this contradiction rendered the impugned cancellation-related actions unsustainable. The separate section 63 assessment orders were left to be challenged through statutory appeals. - HC
Cancellation of GST registration was held vitiated for breach of natural justice where the taxpayer's revocation application remained undecided beyond the statutory time and the department failed to disclose its status, undermining the cancellation process; consequently, the show-cause notice, cancellation order, and appellate dismissal were set aside. Further, the department's stance was internally inconsistent: cancellation proceeded on the premise of no business activity at the premises, yet best-judgment assessments under section 63 for multiple prior years alleged continued business based on GSTR-2A; this contradiction rendered the impugned cancellation-related actions unsustainable. The separate section 63 assessment orders were left to be challenged through statutory appeals. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
