<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST registration cancellation amid delayed revocation and conflicting Section 63 assessments based on GSTR-2A; cancellation orders set aside</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95177</link>
    <description>Cancellation of GST registration was held vitiated for breach of natural justice where the taxpayer&#039;s revocation application remained undecided beyond the statutory time and the department failed to disclose its status, undermining the cancellation process; consequently, the show-cause notice, cancellation order, and appellate dismissal were set aside. Further, the department&#039;s stance was internally inconsistent: cancellation proceeded on the premise of no business activity at the premises, yet best-judgment assessments under section 63 for multiple prior years alleged continued business based on GSTR-2A; this contradiction rendered the impugned cancellation-related actions unsustainable. The separate section 63 assessment orders were left to be challenged through statutory appeals. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:02:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:02:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST registration cancellation amid delayed revocation and conflicting Section 63 assessments based on GSTR-2A; cancellation orders set aside</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95177</link>
      <description>Cancellation of GST registration was held vitiated for breach of natural justice where the taxpayer&#039;s revocation application remained undecided beyond the statutory time and the department failed to disclose its status, undermining the cancellation process; consequently, the show-cause notice, cancellation order, and appellate dismissal were set aside. Further, the department&#039;s stance was internally inconsistent: cancellation proceeded on the premise of no business activity at the premises, yet best-judgment assessments under section 63 for multiple prior years alleged continued business based on GSTR-2A; this contradiction rendered the impugned cancellation-related actions unsustainable. The separate section 63 assessment orders were left to be challenged through statutory appeals. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:02:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>