Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Misclassification between copra and dry coconut: customs recovery and re-valuation quashed for lack of prior licensing-authority invalidation, appeals...
AAR held that the "Neat Pad" is a communication device/apparatus for transmission or reception of voice, images or other data over wired or wireless networks and is not covered by exclusion headings 8443, 8525, 8527 or 8528. Applying the HSN Explanatory Notes, it was classified under CTH 8517, specifically under residuary CTI 8517 69 90 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. AAR further held that "Neat Pad" is not covered by the exclusion clauses under Sr. No. 20 of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs, as amended, and thus is eligible for the concessional Basic Customs Duty rate of 10%.
AAR held that the "Neat Pad" is a communication device/apparatus for transmission or reception of voice, images or other data over wired or wireless networks and is not covered by exclusion headings 8443, 8525, 8527 or 8528. Applying the HSN Explanatory Notes, it was classified under CTH 8517, specifically under residuary CTI 8517 69 90 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. AAR further held that "Neat Pad" is not covered by the exclusion clauses under Sr. No. 20 of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs, as amended, and thus is eligible for the concessional Basic Customs Duty rate of 10%.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
