Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the imported Neat Pad is classifiable under CTH 8517, and more specifically under CTI 8517 69 90; (ii) Whether the Neat Pad is excluded from the benefit of Sr. No. 20 of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs dated 30.06.2017.
Issue (i): Whether the imported Neat Pad is classifiable under CTH 8517, and more specifically under CTI 8517 69 90.
Analysis: The device was found to be a communication apparatus used for reception and transmission of voice, images and other data through wired or wireless networks. Applying the terms of heading 8517, the relevant chapter and heading notes, and the HSN Explanatory Notes, the device was held to fall within heading 8517. Since it was not covered by the specific sub-headings under 8517 61 or 8517 62, it was treated as falling under the residuary sub-heading 8517 69 and, in particular, CTI 8517 69 90.
Conclusion: The Neat Pad is classifiable under CTH 8517 and specifically under CTI 8517 69 90.
Issue (ii): Whether the Neat Pad is excluded from the benefit of Sr. No. 20 of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs dated 30.06.2017.
Analysis: The exemption at Sr. No. 20 applies to goods under CTI 8517 62 90 or 8517 69 90 except for the listed exclusions. On the material placed, the device was held not to answer the descriptions of the excluded goods. Reference was also made to CBIC Circular No. 08/2023 dated 13.03.2023 and the clarification received from the Department of Telecommunications, both supporting the view that the product did not fall within the exclusion list.
Conclusion: The Neat Pad is not excluded from Sr. No. 20 of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs and is eligible for the concessional benefit.
Final Conclusion: The ruling accepts the proposed tariff classification and extends the notification benefit claimed by the applicant.
Ratio Decidendi: A device whose essential character is that of a communication apparatus for transmission or reception of data in wired or wireless networks, and which is not covered by a specific sub-heading or the notification exclusions, is classifiable under the residuary tariff item and qualifies for the applicable exemption benefit.