Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7341 to 7360 of 96508 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AAR held that N/N 134/94-Cus dated 22.06.1994 and the MOOWR scheme, though both operating under s.65 of the Customs Act, 1962, function in distinct domains and their benefits cannot be simultaneously availed for the same imported second-hand goods. The applicant may, however, claim duty exemption under N/N 134/94-Cus for second-hand goods imported for repair, reconditioning, re-engineering, testing, calibration or maintenance, subject to strict compliance with its conditions, including re-export within three years and prior approval of the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs under s.65. AAR further clarified that valuation and duty treatment of wastage/scrap generated during such operations will be governed by s.65(2), differing based on whether resultant goods are exported or cleared for home consumption.
AAR held that N/N 134/94-Cus dated 22.06.1994 and the MOOWR scheme, though both operating under s.65 of the Customs Act, 1962, function in distinct domains and their benefits cannot be simultaneously availed for the same imported second-hand goods. The applicant may, however, claim duty exemption under N/N 134/94-Cus for second-hand goods imported for repair, reconditioning, re-engineering, testing, calibration or maintenance, subject to strict compliance with its conditions, including re-export within three years and prior approval of the jurisdictional Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs under s.65. AAR further clarified that valuation and duty treatment of wastage/scrap generated during such operations will be governed by s.65(2), differing based on whether resultant goods are exported or cleared for home consumption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.