Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessees' appeals and deleted all additions made under s.153C. Relying on a coordinate bench decision arising from the same search group, ITAT held there was no seized material or statements indicating receipt of cash or other unaccounted consideration, nor any identified payer or corresponding additions in counterparties' hands. It held that in circular transactions, the margin disclosed in the books represents the commission element and, absent incriminating material, no higher income can be estimated on mere presumption. ITAT ruled that s.153C cannot be used for roving reassessment without assessee-specific incriminating material, and that estimated additions based on alleged bogus purchases/sales and enhanced profit rates were unsustainable. The jurisdictional challenge under s.153C was rendered academic.
ITAT allowed the assessees' appeals and deleted all additions made under s.153C. Relying on a coordinate bench decision arising from the same search group, ITAT held there was no seized material or statements indicating receipt of cash or other unaccounted consideration, nor any identified payer or corresponding additions in counterparties' hands. It held that in circular transactions, the margin disclosed in the books represents the commission element and, absent incriminating material, no higher income can be estimated on mere presumption. ITAT ruled that s.153C cannot be used for roving reassessment without assessee-specific incriminating material, and that estimated additions based on alleged bogus purchases/sales and enhanced profit rates were unsustainable. The jurisdictional challenge under s.153C was rendered academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.