Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessees' appeals and deleted all additions made under s.153C. Relying on a coordinate bench decision arising from the same search group, ITAT held there was no seized material or statements indicating receipt of cash or other unaccounted consideration, nor any identified payer or corresponding additions in counterparties' hands. It held that in circular transactions, the margin disclosed in the books represents the commission element and, absent incriminating material, no higher income can be estimated on mere presumption. ITAT ruled that s.153C cannot be used for roving reassessment without assessee-specific incriminating material, and that estimated additions based on alleged bogus purchases/sales and enhanced profit rates were unsustainable. The jurisdictional challenge under s.153C was rendered academic.
ITAT allowed the assessees' appeals and deleted all additions made under s.153C. Relying on a coordinate bench decision arising from the same search group, ITAT held there was no seized material or statements indicating receipt of cash or other unaccounted consideration, nor any identified payer or corresponding additions in counterparties' hands. It held that in circular transactions, the margin disclosed in the books represents the commission element and, absent incriminating material, no higher income can be estimated on mere presumption. ITAT ruled that s.153C cannot be used for roving reassessment without assessee-specific incriminating material, and that estimated additions based on alleged bogus purchases/sales and enhanced profit rates were unsustainable. The jurisdictional challenge under s.153C was rendered academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.