Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
ITAT allowed the assessees' appeals and deleted all additions made under s.153C. Relying on a coordinate bench decision arising from the same search group, ITAT held there was no seized material or statements indicating receipt of cash or other unaccounted consideration, nor any identified payer or corresponding additions in counterparties' hands. It held that in circular transactions, the margin disclosed in the books represents the commission element and, absent incriminating material, no higher income can be estimated on mere presumption. ITAT ruled that s.153C cannot be used for roving reassessment without assessee-specific incriminating material, and that estimated additions based on alleged bogus purchases/sales and enhanced profit rates were unsustainable. The jurisdictional challenge under s.153C was rendered academic.
ITAT allowed the assessees' appeals and deleted all additions made under s.153C. Relying on a coordinate bench decision arising from the same search group, ITAT held there was no seized material or statements indicating receipt of cash or other unaccounted consideration, nor any identified payer or corresponding additions in counterparties' hands. It held that in circular transactions, the margin disclosed in the books represents the commission element and, absent incriminating material, no higher income can be estimated on mere presumption. ITAT ruled that s.153C cannot be used for roving reassessment without assessee-specific incriminating material, and that estimated additions based on alleged bogus purchases/sales and enhanced profit rates were unsustainable. The jurisdictional challenge under s.153C was rendered academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.