Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that post-2016 amendment to Section 13(8) SARFAESI, only the borrower's right of redemption is extinguished upon publication of the sale notice; ownership in the secured asset transfers only upon issuance of a sale certificate under Rule 9(6). Relying on Indian Overseas Bank and Delhi HC precedent, the Court held that once an interim moratorium under Section 96 IBC commences, the secured creditor cannot accept balance consideration or complete the statutory sale. As substantial payments and receipt thereof occurred after the interim moratorium, no sale certificate could lawfully issue and no ownership passed to the auction purchaser. The petitioner, therefore, had no right to possession. Writ petition dismissed.
HC held that post-2016 amendment to Section 13(8) SARFAESI, only the borrower's right of redemption is extinguished upon publication of the sale notice; ownership in the secured asset transfers only upon issuance of a sale certificate under Rule 9(6). Relying on Indian Overseas Bank and Delhi HC precedent, the Court held that once an interim moratorium under Section 96 IBC commences, the secured creditor cannot accept balance consideration or complete the statutory sale. As substantial payments and receipt thereof occurred after the interim moratorium, no sale certificate could lawfully issue and no ownership passed to the auction purchaser. The petitioner, therefore, had no right to possession. Writ petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.