Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The HC dismissed the application seeking condonation of 116 days' delay in filing an appeal under S.42 PMLA. It held that, read with S.29(2) Limitation Act, the statutory scheme under S.42 PMLA prescribes a maximum outer limit of 120 days (60 days plus a further 60 days) for filing an appeal, expressly excluding the application of S.5 Limitation Act beyond this period. Relying on analogous SC precedents under the Electricity Act and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the HC concluded it lacks jurisdiction to condone delay beyond 120 days, rendering the appeal time-barred.
The HC dismissed the application seeking condonation of 116 days' delay in filing an appeal under S.42 PMLA. It held that, read with S.29(2) Limitation Act, the statutory scheme under S.42 PMLA prescribes a maximum outer limit of 120 days (60 days plus a further 60 days) for filing an appeal, expressly excluding the application of S.5 Limitation Act beyond this period. Relying on analogous SC precedents under the Electricity Act and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the HC concluded it lacks jurisdiction to condone delay beyond 120 days, rendering the appeal time-barred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
