Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal substantially. The disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D was largely deleted, holding that AO failed to record the mandatory satisfaction u/s 14A(2), rendering application of Rule 8D jurisdictionally invalid; the assessee's suo motu disallowance was accepted, with Rule 8D(2)(i) and 8D(2)(ii) disallowances deleted, and Rule 8D(2)(iii) confined to investments actually yielding exempt income. Disallowances of professional fees to a group foundation and expenses of the UK branch/guest house were held revenue in nature and allowable u/s 37(1), including refurbishment expenses treated as repairs. However, payment for installation of a new pump system was held capital in nature, with depreciation allowable.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal substantially. The disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D was largely deleted, holding that AO failed to record the mandatory satisfaction u/s 14A(2), rendering application of Rule 8D jurisdictionally invalid; the assessee's suo motu disallowance was accepted, with Rule 8D(2)(i) and 8D(2)(ii) disallowances deleted, and Rule 8D(2)(iii) confined to investments actually yielding exempt income. Disallowances of professional fees to a group foundation and expenses of the UK branch/guest house were held revenue in nature and allowable u/s 37(1), including refurbishment expenses treated as repairs. However, payment for installation of a new pump system was held capital in nature, with depreciation allowable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.