Drawings/designs supply and erection supervision fees from German contractor: designs non-taxable; supervision taxed as FTS/PE depending on six-month ...
Imported analyser diagnostic cartridges treated as accessories with analyser system, not standalone diagnostic reagents; extended limitation and penal...
Steel-timber construction shuttering/formwork tariff classification dispute: essential character held steel, classified as shuttering under Heading 73...
The customs authority issues a standing order implementing CBIC Circular No. 54/2016-Cus to rationalise and simplify the procedure for fixation of Brand Rate of duty drawback. Original duty-paid documents are no longer routinely required for endorsement or defacement; instead, up to 5% of originals of self-attested copies will be randomly selected for post-facto verification based on dynamic risk parameters set by the Commissioner. Current risk parameters target Bills of Entry for core inputs of export goods, high-value inputs, and inputs attracting higher customs duty. These parameters must be updated with technological or input changes, and exporters must submit all required documents and comply fully with the circular's conditions.
The customs authority issues a standing order implementing CBIC Circular No. 54/2016-Cus to rationalise and simplify the procedure for fixation of Brand Rate of duty drawback. Original duty-paid documents are no longer routinely required for endorsement or defacement; instead, up to 5% of originals of self-attested copies will be randomly selected for post-facto verification based on dynamic risk parameters set by the Commissioner. Current risk parameters target Bills of Entry for core inputs of export goods, high-value inputs, and inputs attracting higher customs duty. These parameters must be updated with technological or input changes, and exporters must submit all required documents and comply fully with the circular's conditions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.