Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the deletion of addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE on cash deposits of specified bank notes during demonetisation. The Tribunal held that the impugned cash deposits represented recorded sales already credited to the Profit & Loss account, duly reflected in audited books and VAT/Sales Tax returns, with no rejection of books or discrepancy in sales, purchases or stock by the AO. Since the sales were accepted as genuine and payments for purchases were routed through banking channels, invoking s.68 would result in impermissible double addition. The order of CIT(A) deleting the addition was affirmed.
ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the deletion of addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE on cash deposits of specified bank notes during demonetisation. The Tribunal held that the impugned cash deposits represented recorded sales already credited to the Profit & Loss account, duly reflected in audited books and VAT/Sales Tax returns, with no rejection of books or discrepancy in sales, purchases or stock by the AO. Since the sales were accepted as genuine and payments for purchases were routed through banking channels, invoking s.68 would result in impermissible double addition. The order of CIT(A) deleting the addition was affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
