Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 and declined to quash the notice u/s 143(2). It held that under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997, the declarant is protected only from enquiry into the source of income, not from scrutiny of the correctness or completeness of the income disclosed. If higher income comes to the department's notice, the Scheme does not mandate acceptance of the declared figure. Alleged violation of Instruction No. 1984 was rejected as the instructions were prospective and issued after the impugned notice. The writ petition was dismissed, leaving the assessee to raise all objections before the AO and avail the statutory appellate remedies.
HC upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 and declined to quash the notice u/s 143(2). It held that under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997, the declarant is protected only from enquiry into the source of income, not from scrutiny of the correctness or completeness of the income disclosed. If higher income comes to the department's notice, the Scheme does not mandate acceptance of the declared figure. Alleged violation of Instruction No. 1984 was rejected as the instructions were prospective and issued after the impugned notice. The writ petition was dismissed, leaving the assessee to raise all objections before the AO and avail the statutory appellate remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.