<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment u/s 147 Valid Despite VDIS 1997 Declaration; Scrutiny Notice u/s 143(2) and Writ Challenge Rejected</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94844</link>
    <description>HC upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 and declined to quash the notice u/s 143(2). It held that under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997, the declarant is protected only from enquiry into the source of income, not from scrutiny of the correctness or completeness of the income disclosed. If higher income comes to the department&#039;s notice, the Scheme does not mandate acceptance of the declared figure. Alleged violation of Instruction No. 1984 was rejected as the instructions were prospective and issued after the impugned notice. The writ petition was dismissed, leaving the assessee to raise all objections before the AO and avail the statutory appellate remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 08:31:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 08:31:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment u/s 147 Valid Despite VDIS 1997 Declaration; Scrutiny Notice u/s 143(2) and Writ Challenge Rejected</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94844</link>
      <description>HC upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 and declined to quash the notice u/s 143(2). It held that under the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997, the declarant is protected only from enquiry into the source of income, not from scrutiny of the correctness or completeness of the income disclosed. If higher income comes to the department&#039;s notice, the Scheme does not mandate acceptance of the declared figure. Alleged violation of Instruction No. 1984 was rejected as the instructions were prospective and issued after the impugned notice. The writ petition was dismissed, leaving the assessee to raise all objections before the AO and avail the statutory appellate remedies.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 08:31:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>