Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC dismissed Revenue's appeal under s.260A, holding that no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT order. On taxability of receipts u/s 28(iv) and their inclusion in book profits u/s 115JB, HC held the issues were concluded against Revenue and in favour of assessee by binding SC precedents. On the alternative plea to tax the receipt as "income from other sources" u/s 56 on the footing that a company cannot gift to another company, HC refused to entertain the contention as it did not arise from the ITAT's factual findings. ITAT's relief in favour of assessee stood affirmed.
HC dismissed Revenue's appeal under s.260A, holding that no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT order. On taxability of receipts u/s 28(iv) and their inclusion in book profits u/s 115JB, HC held the issues were concluded against Revenue and in favour of assessee by binding SC precedents. On the alternative plea to tax the receipt as "income from other sources" u/s 56 on the footing that a company cannot gift to another company, HC refused to entertain the contention as it did not arise from the ITAT's factual findings. ITAT's relief in favour of assessee stood affirmed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.