Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Revenue appeal under s.260A fails; SC precedents govern s.28(iv), s.115JB, s.56 gift-income claim rejected, assessee's relief affirmed

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....HC dismissed Revenue's appeal under s.260A, holding that no substantial question of law arose from the ITAT order. On taxability of receipts u/s 28(iv) and their inclusion in book profits u/s 115JB, HC held the issues were concluded against Revenue and in favour of assessee by binding SC precedents. On the alternative plea to tax the receipt as "income from other sources" u/s 56 on the footing that a company cannot gift to another company, HC refused to entertain the contention as it did not arise from the ITAT's factual findings. ITAT's relief in favour of assessee stood affirmed.....