Drawings/designs supply and erection supervision fees from German contractor: designs non-taxable; supervision taxed as FTS/PE depending on six-month ...
Imported analyser diagnostic cartridges treated as accessories with analyser system, not standalone diagnostic reagents; extended limitation and penal...
Steel-timber construction shuttering/formwork tariff classification dispute: essential character held steel, classified as shuttering under Heading 73...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the addition made as unexplained expenditure u/s 69C in respect of alleged furniture expenses incurred by the assessee's spouse. The Tribunal noted that, as per the capital account and balance sheet as on 31.03.2017, the spouse possessed sufficient funds to meet the furniture expenditure of Rs. 17,50,000/-. In the absence of any rebuttal or contrary material from the Revenue, the explanation could not be discarded. The addition was held to be arbitrary, misconceived and unsustainable in law.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the addition made as unexplained expenditure u/s 69C in respect of alleged furniture expenses incurred by the assessee's spouse. The Tribunal noted that, as per the capital account and balance sheet as on 31.03.2017, the spouse possessed sufficient funds to meet the furniture expenditure of Rs. 17,50,000/-. In the absence of any rebuttal or contrary material from the Revenue, the explanation could not be discarded. The addition was held to be arbitrary, misconceived and unsustainable in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
