Tax appeal allowed: AO exceeded s.144C DRP mandate by introducing new findings and recharacterising non-resident receipts as permanent establishment i...
Anonymized petitioner gets partial relief: bank guarantee quashed, PVC-coated fabric released under reduced conditions while valuation proceedings con...
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of CIT(A) in toto. The Tribunal affirmed deletion of addition u/s 68 r/w s.115BBE on alleged unexplained sundry creditors, holding that only opening balances were involved and no fresh credit arose in the relevant previous year. Disallowance of GST expenditure was sustained as allowable business outgo, the liability having crystallized during the year when input tax credit had lapsed. On alleged bogus purchases, ITAT endorsed CIT(A)'s restriction of addition to a nominal gross profit rate, as books were audited, not rejected, and sales and stock records were accepted. Deletion of addition on alleged difference in purchases was also confirmed, the AO having miscompared net and gross figures.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of CIT(A) in toto. The Tribunal affirmed deletion of addition u/s 68 r/w s.115BBE on alleged unexplained sundry creditors, holding that only opening balances were involved and no fresh credit arose in the relevant previous year. Disallowance of GST expenditure was sustained as allowable business outgo, the liability having crystallized during the year when input tax credit had lapsed. On alleged bogus purchases, ITAT endorsed CIT(A)'s restriction of addition to a nominal gross profit rate, as books were audited, not rejected, and sales and stock records were accepted. Deletion of addition on alleged difference in purchases was also confirmed, the AO having miscompared net and gross figures.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
