Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7381 to 7400 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Office memorandum clarifies the procedure when a taxpayer's MAP application under Rule 44G is successfully resolved while an income tax appeal is pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Following mutual agreement, the taxpayer must accept or reject the resolution and provide proof of appeal withdrawal. Since no explicit process existed for withdrawal at the CIT(A) stage, the memorandum directs CIT(A) offices to issue an intimation confirming acceptance of withdrawal of the appeal or specific grounds covered by the MAP resolution. This intimation will constitute valid proof of withdrawal for purposes of Rule 44G(8).
Office memorandum clarifies the procedure when a taxpayer's MAP application under Rule 44G is successfully resolved while an income tax appeal is pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Following mutual agreement, the taxpayer must accept or reject the resolution and provide proof of appeal withdrawal. Since no explicit process existed for withdrawal at the CIT(A) stage, the memorandum directs CIT(A) offices to issue an intimation confirming acceptance of withdrawal of the appeal or specific grounds covered by the MAP resolution. This intimation will constitute valid proof of withdrawal for purposes of Rule 44G(8).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.