Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting additions made u/s 69C and 68. In respect of purchases from the alleged accommodation entry provider, the Tribunal held that the assessee had produced purchase invoices, e-way bills, transport documents, ledger extracts and bank statements evidencing payment through banking channels, and the AO brought no contrary material except a CGST report; the purchases were found to be actually used in manufacturing. For unsecured loans from five creditors, the assessee had filed ITRs, confirmations and bank statements, with no defects identified by AO or CIT(A). Consequently, the CIT(A)'s order was set aside.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting additions made u/s 69C and 68. In respect of purchases from the alleged accommodation entry provider, the Tribunal held that the assessee had produced purchase invoices, e-way bills, transport documents, ledger extracts and bank statements evidencing payment through banking channels, and the AO brought no contrary material except a CGST report; the purchases were found to be actually used in manufacturing. For unsecured loans from five creditors, the assessee had filed ITRs, confirmations and bank statements, with no defects identified by AO or CIT(A). Consequently, the CIT(A)'s order was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
