Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A). On transfer pricing, the Tribunal followed its own decisions in the assessee's earlier assessment years, holding that no further upward adjustment was warranted in respect of the corporate guarantee fee/commission charged on guarantees provided to AEs, there being no change in facts or law. On MEIS receipts, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s treatment of such receipts as capital in nature, relying on its prior orders in the assessee's own case and aligned with SC jurisprudence, and therefore declined to interfere with the relief granted.
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A). On transfer pricing, the Tribunal followed its own decisions in the assessee's earlier assessment years, holding that no further upward adjustment was warranted in respect of the corporate guarantee fee/commission charged on guarantees provided to AEs, there being no change in facts or law. On MEIS receipts, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s treatment of such receipts as capital in nature, relying on its prior orders in the assessee's own case and aligned with SC jurisprudence, and therefore declined to interfere with the relief granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.