Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A). On transfer pricing, the Tribunal followed its own decisions in the assessee's earlier assessment years, holding that no further upward adjustment was warranted in respect of the corporate guarantee fee/commission charged on guarantees provided to AEs, there being no change in facts or law. On MEIS receipts, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s treatment of such receipts as capital in nature, relying on its prior orders in the assessee's own case and aligned with SC jurisprudence, and therefore declined to interfere with the relief granted.
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A). On transfer pricing, the Tribunal followed its own decisions in the assessee's earlier assessment years, holding that no further upward adjustment was warranted in respect of the corporate guarantee fee/commission charged on guarantees provided to AEs, there being no change in facts or law. On MEIS receipts, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s treatment of such receipts as capital in nature, relying on its prior orders in the assessee's own case and aligned with SC jurisprudence, and therefore declined to interfere with the relief granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.