New LODR Fifth Amendment reshapes related party transaction rules, disclosure duties, and non-convertible security communication timelines under Sched...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
8841 to 8860 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the challenge to the original order u/s 73 pursuant to DRC-01 dated 30.05.2024 was infructuous, as the earlier demand dated 24.08.2024 stood obliterated and substituted by a revised order dated 18.03.2025 under s.161, raising a fresh demand of Rs. 3,85,35,356/- on different grounds. Observing that the petitioner did not cooperate or respond to notices dated 05.12.2024 and 25.01.2025, HC nevertheless remitted the matter to the 2nd respondent to pass a fresh order in lieu of the order dated 18.03.2025. The order dated 18.03.2025 is to operate as a show cause notice. Petition dismissed.
HC held that the challenge to the original order u/s 73 pursuant to DRC-01 dated 30.05.2024 was infructuous, as the earlier demand dated 24.08.2024 stood obliterated and substituted by a revised order dated 18.03.2025 under s.161, raising a fresh demand of Rs. 3,85,35,356/- on different grounds. Observing that the petitioner did not cooperate or respond to notices dated 05.12.2024 and 25.01.2025, HC nevertheless remitted the matter to the 2nd respondent to pass a fresh order in lieu of the order dated 18.03.2025. The order dated 18.03.2025 is to operate as a show cause notice. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
