PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the challenge to the original order u/s 73 pursuant to DRC-01 dated 30.05.2024 was infructuous, as the earlier demand dated 24.08.2024 stood obliterated and substituted by a revised order dated 18.03.2025 under s.161, raising a fresh demand of Rs. 3,85,35,356/- on different grounds. Observing that the petitioner did not cooperate or respond to notices dated 05.12.2024 and 25.01.2025, HC nevertheless remitted the matter to the 2nd respondent to pass a fresh order in lieu of the order dated 18.03.2025. The order dated 18.03.2025 is to operate as a show cause notice. Petition dismissed.
HC held that the challenge to the original order u/s 73 pursuant to DRC-01 dated 30.05.2024 was infructuous, as the earlier demand dated 24.08.2024 stood obliterated and substituted by a revised order dated 18.03.2025 under s.161, raising a fresh demand of Rs. 3,85,35,356/- on different grounds. Observing that the petitioner did not cooperate or respond to notices dated 05.12.2024 and 25.01.2025, HC nevertheless remitted the matter to the 2nd respondent to pass a fresh order in lieu of the order dated 18.03.2025. The order dated 18.03.2025 is to operate as a show cause notice. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.