Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed Revenue's appeal and restored the disallowance of weighted deduction claimed u/s 35(1)(ii) by the assessee on donations made to a specified research institute. The Tribunal held that the donee institute did not have valid approval u/s 35(1)(ii) after 31.03.2006 and had procured donations on the basis of forged documents, rendering the assessee's claim impermissible in law. Relying on its earlier decision in a comparable case and the adverse findings of the Revenue, ITAT upheld the AO's action and quashed the order of CIT(A) which had granted relief to the assessee.
ITAT allowed Revenue's appeal and restored the disallowance of weighted deduction claimed u/s 35(1)(ii) by the assessee on donations made to a specified research institute. The Tribunal held that the donee institute did not have valid approval u/s 35(1)(ii) after 31.03.2006 and had procured donations on the basis of forged documents, rendering the assessee's claim impermissible in law. Relying on its earlier decision in a comparable case and the adverse findings of the Revenue, ITAT upheld the AO's action and quashed the order of CIT(A) which had granted relief to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.