<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax deduction denied on donations under Section 35(1)(ii) due to forged approval, revenue appeal allowed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94654</link>
    <description>ITAT allowed Revenue&#039;s appeal and restored the disallowance of weighted deduction claimed u/s 35(1)(ii) by the assessee on donations made to a specified research institute. The Tribunal held that the donee institute did not have valid approval u/s 35(1)(ii) after 31.03.2006 and had procured donations on the basis of forged documents, rendering the assessee&#039;s claim impermissible in law. Relying on its earlier decision in a comparable case and the adverse findings of the Revenue, ITAT upheld the AO&#039;s action and quashed the order of CIT(A) which had granted relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:11:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:11:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=868328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax deduction denied on donations under Section 35(1)(ii) due to forged approval, revenue appeal allowed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94654</link>
      <description>ITAT allowed Revenue&#039;s appeal and restored the disallowance of weighted deduction claimed u/s 35(1)(ii) by the assessee on donations made to a specified research institute. The Tribunal held that the donee institute did not have valid approval u/s 35(1)(ii) after 31.03.2006 and had procured donations on the basis of forged documents, rendering the assessee&#039;s claim impermissible in law. Relying on its earlier decision in a comparable case and the adverse findings of the Revenue, ITAT upheld the AO&#039;s action and quashed the order of CIT(A) which had granted relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 14:11:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>