Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's refusal to grant the Liquidator's claimed remuneration under Regulation 4(2)(b) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. It held that the Liquidator's fee, being percentage-based on assets realised or distributed net of liquidation costs, was not payable as no assets were realised or distributed during the liquidation period. The Tribunal further noted that neither the CoC, at the time of recommending liquidation, nor the SCC subsequently, had fixed or approved any separate fee for the present Liquidator. Consequently, the Liquidator's application seeking a fixed fee of Rs. 2.5 lakhs per month was rejected as untenable, and the appeal was dismissed.
NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's refusal to grant the Liquidator's claimed remuneration under Regulation 4(2)(b) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. It held that the Liquidator's fee, being percentage-based on assets realised or distributed net of liquidation costs, was not payable as no assets were realised or distributed during the liquidation period. The Tribunal further noted that neither the CoC, at the time of recommending liquidation, nor the SCC subsequently, had fixed or approved any separate fee for the present Liquidator. Consequently, the Liquidator's application seeking a fixed fee of Rs. 2.5 lakhs per month was rejected as untenable, and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
