Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Liquidator denied monthly fee as no assets realised under Regulation 4(2)(b), absence of CoC-approved remuneration fatal

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's refusal to grant the Liquidator's claimed remuneration under Regulation 4(2)(b) of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. It held that the Liquidator's fee, being percentage-based on assets realised or distributed net of liquidation costs, was not payable as no assets were realised or distributed during the liquidation period. The Tribunal further noted that neither the CoC, at the time of recommending liquidation, nor the SCC subsequently, had fixed or approved any separate fee for the present Liquidator. Consequently, the Liquidator's application seeking a fixed fee of Rs. 2.5 lakhs per month was rejected as untenable, and the appeal was dismissed.....