Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that, in principle, discretionary trusts with indeterminate or unknown beneficiary shares are liable to tax at the maximum marginal rate under s.164(1), unless covered by the limited statutory exceptions in s.164(3) or the proviso to s.164. ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s view that CPC correctly applied the maximum marginal rate based on the return filed as AOP/BOI with sub-status of Business Trust and found no infirmity in the appellate order on this aspect. However, ITAT observed that crucial factual aspects remained unverified, including the nature of the trust under the Will, uniqueness of the trust, dependency and identifiability of beneficiaries, representative assessee status under s.160(1)(iv), and determinacy of shares. Accordingly, ITAT remanded the matter to the AO for de novo verification and fresh determination of tax status.
ITAT held that, in principle, discretionary trusts with indeterminate or unknown beneficiary shares are liable to tax at the maximum marginal rate under s.164(1), unless covered by the limited statutory exceptions in s.164(3) or the proviso to s.164. ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s view that CPC correctly applied the maximum marginal rate based on the return filed as AOP/BOI with sub-status of Business Trust and found no infirmity in the appellate order on this aspect. However, ITAT observed that crucial factual aspects remained unverified, including the nature of the trust under the Will, uniqueness of the trust, dependency and identifiability of beneficiaries, representative assessee status under s.160(1)(iv), and determinacy of shares. Accordingly, ITAT remanded the matter to the AO for de novo verification and fresh determination of tax status.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.