1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
ITAT held that, in principle, discretionary trusts with indeterminate or unknown beneficiary shares are liable to tax at the maximum marginal rate under s.164(1), unless covered by the limited statutory exceptions in s.164(3) or the proviso to s.164. ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s view that CPC correctly applied the maximum marginal rate based on the return filed as AOP/BOI with sub-status of Business Trust and found no infirmity in the appellate order on this aspect. However, ITAT observed that crucial factual aspects remained unverified, including the nature of the trust under the Will, uniqueness of the trust, dependency and identifiability of beneficiaries, representative assessee status under s.160(1)(iv), and determinacy of shares. Accordingly, ITAT remanded the matter to the AO for de novo verification and fresh determination of tax status.